The Supreme Court of India has reiterated that a registered sale deed enjoys a strong presumption of validity and cannot be casually branded as a sham to defeat a property transaction.
In its ruling, the court underlined that registration is a serious legal act that lends credibility to a document. “It is a settled position of law that a registered Sale Deed carries with it a formidable presumption of validity and genuineness. Registration is not a mere procedural formality but a solemn act,” the court observed.
The judgment was delivered in a long-running property dispute where the validity of a registered sale deed was challenged on the ground that it did not reflect the true intention of the parties. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s decision, which had treated the registered deed as a sham transaction.
The dispute concerned a property transaction dating back several decades. A registered sale deed was executed for consideration, followed by a separate registered rent agreement that allowed the original owner to remain in possession of the property as a tenant.
Subsequently, when rent defaults occurred and eviction proceedings were initiated, the seller disputed the sale, claiming that the documents were nominal and that the transaction was in substance a mortgage rather than an outright sale.
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, noting that a registered sale deed carries significant evidentiary value. The bench held that courts must exercise caution before declaring such documents to be sham, and that mere allegations or delayed claims are not sufficient to rebut the presumption of genuineness attached to a registered instrument.
The court further observed that if a transaction is intended to operate as a mortgage or a conditional sale, such intent must be clearly reflected in the document itself. In the absence of clauses providing for reconveyance or repayment, a registered sale deed cannot later be recharacterised based on unsupported assertions.
After examining the contents of the deed in question, the court concluded that it reflected a clear intention to transfer ownership through an outright sale. It therefore restored the earlier ruling upholding the validity of the sale deed and dismissed the challenge.
The judgment reinforces established principles of property law by affirming that registration provides legal certainty and public notice of transactions. It also sends a clear message to lower courts that registered documents should not be undermined lightly, and that strong and convincing evidence is required to challenge their authenticity.
The ruling is expected to guide future cases involving disputes over alleged sham transactions and strengthen confidence in registered property instruments.
Reference - https://share.google/fDHIhaeSJxag5Q2bD